Lisa Zaar vs Aneta Laboutkova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Zaar has a second serve win rate of 35% over the last six months, while Laboutkova's rate stands at 40.18%. How crucial is this? Higher second serve win percentages often indicate a stronger prediction accuracy.
• Regarding return games, Zaar excels by winning 54.35% of points on opponents' second serves, surpassing Laboutkova's 51.12%. On first serve returns, Zaar has 38.26%, higher than Laboutkova's 35.54%. This often reveals who has the upper hand in their matchup.
• When under pressure, Laboutkova slightly outshines Zaar by saving 48.17% of breakpoints compared to Zaar's 46.89%. This statistic can be significant for in-game betting.
• Over the past year, Zaar won 61.11% of matches (44/28), whereas Laboutkova achieved a 52.73% win rate (29/26), providing insight into their overall competitiveness.
• Zaar prefers Indoor Hard surfaces with a win rate of 59%, while Laboutkova excels on Clay with a win rate of 53%. Could this surface preference impact the outcome?
• In Challenger/ITF tournaments, Zaar has a superior win percentage of 61.9% compared to Laboutkova's 54%. This reflects the relative strength each player shows at this competition level.
• Over the last year, Zaar faced opponents with an average rank of 401.31, slightly more challenging than Laboutkova's 430.93. Does facing tougher opponents give Zaar an edge?
• In deciding sets, Zaar boasts a 61% win rate while Laboutkova has 44%. This could be pivotal in live betting scenarios.
• Recently, Zaar has converted 42.31% of breakpoints, while Laboutkova has converted 47.01%. This can be crucial for predicting outcomes during live matches.

Editorial Prediction (August 5, 2025, UTC):

In evaluating the matchup between Zaar and Laboutkova, each player has distinct strengths. Zaar demonstrates notable resilience in return games and against higher-ranked opponents, which suggests an advantage in areas where it matters in tighter matches.

However, Laboutkova presents a slightly better record in converting breakpoints and handling pressure based on recent statistics. This advantage could play an essential role in high-stakes moments during the contest.

Both players have their preferred surfaces, with Zaar favoring indoor hard courts and Laboutkova excelling on clay. As such, the specific playing surface for this match may influence the outcome significantly.

Considering all performance metrics and trends, Zaar appears to have a marginal edge overall, particularly if the match progresses to a deciding set. Therefore, Zaar is likely the slight favorite to win the upcoming encounter.